The disgusting methods used by the government from killing 40,000 Poe pale to having a network of spies on the French people can never be accepted. . We know that it is immoral for Person B to kill Person C no matter how horrible Person A is to Person B. He had absolute power for some reason, and we see this democracy was not really a democracy--it was really an open trap allowing anyone to become emperor if they were brave enough to take action. In 1793, he was guillotined. On 2 December 1848, Louis Napoleon was elected President of the Second Republic, largely on peasant support. Robespierre wanted a democracy where all citizens were equal and had the same rights.
The decision to go to war in Iraq was not an easy conclusion but it was one that was made with best intentions. We see the true unfairness of the Terror in this spike of killings. Then to make matters worse they were forcing citizens to be soldiers. Led by chief prosecutor, Maximilien Robespierre, found that the king was guilty against the state. He fascinated the American people greatly because he stood for values they stood for such as a better government system. It was a time of fierceness and anger, resulting in the deaths of thousands of people living in France at that period of time. That he knew it is certain and demonstrable: he is condemned by words he himself spoke before The Terror first took post - revolutionary France in its grip.
In 1792, French adversaries were pushing in on all borders and spies were rampant on the streets. Committee of Public Safety, French Revolution, Georges Danton 2372 Words 6 Pages Grace Halleck 1st hour Why was the Reign of Terror not justified? However, I would argue that despite these other outcomes of the Great terror, the most important result of the 1934-38 repression. The Reign of Terror led to a corrupt democracy that allowed the ambitious Napoleon to take over, which lead to people fearing this flawed democracy, which explains why France returned to a monarchy as soon as Napoleon was rid of. The use of — of and abuse and fear toward even innocent people merely to send the message that anyone can be targeted and so all must clear the way for whatever the dictatorial powers decree — is never justified, because what is the point of claiming to oppose and abuses by one set of bosses if the proposed answer is just more oppression and abuses by a new set of bosses? When a country is at war, governments have the right to take up emergency powers. Other methods used was the use of spies on the French people.
This evidence shows that the Reign of Terror was not justified because they were killing everything, even innocent citizens. Another enlightenment idea that was contradicted by the government was not silencing g anyone eased on their opinions or religious views Doc A. In June of 1789 King Louis called the Estates Meeting to discuss taxes and money problems. So I would say that this case it is justified, but I would not do somthing like this if I were given the emergency powers. In our land we want to substitute morality for egotism, integrity for formal codes of honor, principles for customs, a sense of duty for one of mere propriety, the rule of reason for the tyranny of fashion, scorn of vice for scorn of the unlucky; self-respect for insolence, grandeur of soul for vanity, love of glory for the love of money, good people in place of good society. One of the claims made by France was that they were under constant attack by Austrian and Pr Gaussian roofs. Doc A When the guillotining of Louis the 16th occurred Austria became fearful and angry hoping for the safety of the queen and beloved sister Marie Antoinette.
The south German states, in fulfillment of their. Although the Terror was an extreme set of laws, they were the only permanent rules that existed among the chaos. In 1792, French adversaries were pushing in on all borders and spies were rampant on the streets. Year and not using actual evidence Doc E. Appeasement was justified in a few ways, sympathy for Germany, the desire for peace, the threat of communism and the time to rearm. Some believe that the terror occurred to stop counter-revolutionaries, such as the War in Vendée, and happened because of the factions between the Jacobins and Girondins. That's like asking me to justify the deaths of Confederate soldiers in the American civil war.
Causing the middle class and the wealthy classes to benefit greatly from the revolution, the sans-culottes however suffered with the disappearance of their livelihood. In this case, Machiavelli would the ends justify the means in the most inefficient manner. The peasant's fences were broken down and his crops trampled in the chase, but he could claim no damages. Baby Thesis C Finally the Reign Of Terror was justified when it came to ideas or reasons that people and Robespierre had. Another 15% were the middle class. Terrorism can be defined as an unlawful violence or war deliberately targeted to civilians. People accuse each other just to show themselves as the true patriots.
The answer is no, terrorism is never justifiable. Sure, it was not a perfect democracy show me an example of one even today , but it certainly did not elect Napoleon into power in the 1795 elections dont know where that fact came from and most certainly was better than the ancien regime. Conclusion: - Robespierre was justified to rule in the authoritarian manner which he did during the reign of terror since it was a state of emergency after all they were fighting almost all of Europe and their world spanning empires. Accross France 30,000 lost their lives A small committee of 12 unqualified people called The Committee of Public Safety gained control of the government of France teaching the gospel according to Rousseau. For comparison, consider that the reached a point where suggested putting the families and children and supporters of the rightwing against walls and executing them, because he feared that left in exile they would build an opposition force that would one day attempt to come back and overthrow the revolution.
Correlation does not equal causation. The people wanted stable government. This lends weight to arguments against the Terror's justification. It went against the ideas of democracy that Robespierre proposed! Only a fool would respect the corrupt Catholic church at the time i'll go into why it is corrupt in a bit. The strategy used also came at a cost as Bomber Command throughout the bombing campaigns had 57,143 men killed.